🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard females from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence similar discussions in other member states